Why Does the Expression -dy/dx/dx/dy Calculate the Slope at a Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ktpr2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expression -dy/dx/dx/dy and its role in calculating the slope at a point on a curve. Participants clarify that the expression can be interpreted through the chain rule, leading to the relationship dy/dx = (dy/dt)/(dx/dt). The conversation also touches on the practical application of a program designed to check implicit differentiation, which computes the slope at a given point using the derivatives of the function. There is some confusion regarding the necessity of calculating dx/dy, with participants emphasizing that the primary focus should be on dy/dx for finding slopes. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding these derivatives in the context of implicit differentiation and slope calculations.
ktpr2
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I recently wrote a program to check implicit differentiation and the key bit I saw in other programs was the logic amounting to:

-\frac{ \frac{dy}{dx}} {\frac{dx}{dy}}

when given a valid (x,y) point on the curve. Can someone explain why the above generates the slope at point (x,y)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ktpr2 said:
I recently wrote a program to check implicit differentiation and the key bit I saw in other programs was the logic amounting to:

-\frac{ \frac{dy}{dx}} {\frac{dx}{dy}}

when given a valid (x,y) point on the curve. Can someone explain why the above generates the slope at point (x,y)?

Are you sure you don't mean something like:
\frac{ \frac{dy}{dt}} {\frac{dx}{dt}}

This is just the operation of the chain rule:
dy/dt = (dy/dx) (dx/dt)

so dy/dx = (dy/dt)/(dx/dt)
 
Well that's the code snippet I used. To take the derivative of x in terms of y seems kinda heady. The actual code was:

(-der1(eqn,x))/(der1(eqn,y)), which means, according to my ti-86 manual, returns the value of the first derivative ... with respect to variable for the current variable value. This is provided, as a point on the curve.

So I suppose I'm actually just taking the derivative of the expression in terms of a constant. I'm not quite sure what that would mean or if it's nothing more than normal division?

EDIT - Actually, it's probably the derivative of the expression with the value for x or y plugged in. I should probably research dx/dy because that's what's going on here.
 
Last edited:
In the way you've written it,i.e.that ration,i hope u see that it makes no sense whatsoever.

Daniel.
 
Well, that's the program code and it works just fine. I do believe my teacher said you can take dy/dx, just that we won't be doing it anytime soon. I'll talk to him about it.
 
Why are you trying to find dx/dy? I'm confused on what the purpose of your program is. It seems there is some practical purpose, so I just don't see where dx/dy fits in. The code in the first post would find \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} if I'm not mistaken.

Jameson
 
It sounds like you mean:

\frac{d y}{d x} = - \frac{\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}}{\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}}

Is this right? If so, this is the equation for the slope of the contour of constant f passing through some point (x,y) in a 2D contour plot of f(x,y). This formula works because if you change x by some amount, you change f by df/dx*dx. Then to get back on the contour, you must change y by enough to get the opposite change, df/dy*dy=-df/dx*dx. This gives you your formula.
 
statusX- yeah that seems like what's going on.

Jameson -THe program merely checks your answer for implict differentation; you find a point on the curve via TI 8X's Solver function, and run it and it'll give you the slope and ask you to type in your answer. It compares and tells you if you're right or not. (http://www.ticalc.org/pub/86/basic/math/imp.zip )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ktpr,

What are you entering into the calculator to get dx/dy? I'm guessing it's something like "der(y,y)" where you have defined that first "y" to be your function. But that would give you dy/dy which is 1 and would explain why your ratio comes out to be simply dy/dx.

Am I close?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
276
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top