Why Does Energy Decrease When Work Is Done?

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
We have a pair of capacitor plates that are being pulled apart against their attractive force at constant potential difference. We find that the energy stored between the plates decreases when this happens, and we are asked to explain why the energy decreases even though work is being done against the internal force.

I think this is because a battery is required to keep the plates at constant p.d. We find that when the energy between the plates is increased, half of the energy supplied by the battery goes to increasing the internal energy, and half goes to performing external work. I think therefore that if work is done on the system, this constitues the system doing negative work, and therefore we also get a negative increment in the internal energy (interestingly this would also mean that energy is being supplied to the battery.) I would appreciate it if someone would tell me if I'm going along the right lines, and also any pointers if I'm not. thanks very much.

Sachi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For 'large' plate capacitors the E-field is constant and independent of the distance between the plates. So the potential difference across the plates is V=Ed. So if you increase the distance, E must decrease to keep V constant. So charge is flowing away from the the plates.
 
sachi said:
We have a pair of capacitor plates that are being pulled apart against their attractive force at constant potential difference. We find that the energy stored between the plates decreases when this happens, and we are asked to explain why the energy decreases even though work is being done against the internal force.

I think this is because a battery is required to keep the plates at constant p.d. We find that when the energy between the plates is increased, half of the energy supplied by the battery goes to increasing the internal energy, and half goes to performing external work. I think therefore that if work is done on the system, this constitues the system doing negative work, and therefore we also get a negative increment in the internal energy (interestingly this would also mean that energy is being supplied to the battery.) I would appreciate it if someone would tell me if I'm going along the right lines, and also any pointers if I'm not. thanks very much.

Sachi
You are basicly correct. At constant voltage, twice as much energy is put into the battery than the energy you expend. This is shown in advanced EM texts.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top