Why does mass have the force of gravity?

AI Thread Summary
Mass generates the force of gravity through its inherent properties, as described by the equation F = G(m1 x m2)/r^2, where G is the gravitational constant. The gravitational constant is derived empirically, primarily through experiments conducted by Cavendish using torsion springs. A key question in physics is why inertial mass, which resists motion, is equal to gravitational mass, which attracts other masses. This relationship is complex and not easily understood, raising deeper inquiries into the nature of these fundamental forces. Understanding this connection remains a significant challenge in physics.
dhayward
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Where does mass get the force of gravity?


Homework Equations


F = G(m1 x m2)/r^2

F = force (N)
G = Gravitational constant (Nm^2/kg^2)
m = mass
r = distance between m1 and m2


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the actual question here?
 
how is the gravitational constant derived?
 
empirically i think. In other words it is inferred from experiments/observational data and not the result of any derivation.

The holy grail in physics (and I have a completely incomplete understanding--physics is a hobby for me) is to capture all 4 fundamental forces including gravity in a superset of equations with a bare minimum of constants.
 
Are you asking why the inertial mass is equal to the gravitational mass?
 
dhayward said:
how is the gravitational constant derived?

The first who carried out experiments that led to an empirical determination of G was Cavendish. By means of torsion springs, I think.

Your question can, however, be formulated in a "deep" way:

Why should an object's inherent resistance to motion change (i.e, its inertia) be in any way related to the strength of the attractive force existing between objects (i.e, gravitation)?

This identity between inertial mass and gravitational "mass" is not at all a trivially understandable relationship.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top