Why Does My COMSOL Model Not Converge at Higher Heat Flux Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter martingotu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comsol
AI Thread Summary
COMSOL Multiphysics users often encounter convergence issues when increasing heat flux values in non-isothermal flow models. The inability to converge at higher heat flux is not fundamentally restricted but varies based on the specific problem setup. Adjusting solver settings, refining the mesh, or modifying boundary conditions can help achieve convergence. Users are encouraged to explore these adjustments and consider the physical implications of the model. Understanding the nuances of the model and solver can lead to successful solutions at higher heat flux levels.
martingotu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I need some help with COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS. I don´t have any experience with FEM analysis. I am solving a non isothermal flow model, and I am varying heat flux that enters in the subdomain through one boundary. I set a value for heat flux, solve it and increase the value to solve the model again setting the current solution as initial value. (analog to use parametric solver but doing it for myself). The question is that when the heat flux reaches a limit value the problem doesn´t converge and I need to solve the problem for a much higher value. I would like to know what is the reason for this and what can I do to get a solution.
If any of you has experience with this software I would like to ask him some doubts.
Thanks for your opinions.
Martin.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is a duplicate post of this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=235253

I basically answer your question:

Mech_Engineer said:
Technically speaking, there aren't any fundamental reasons you can't raise the flux past a value before the solver doesn't converge, it's really a case-by-case thing based on the problem being solved...
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top