Why Does My Range for a Composite Function Differ from the Textbook's?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between the calculated range of the composite function (q∘p) and the textbook's range. The user calculated the range as -1 ≤ y ≤ 167, while the textbook states it as 0 ≤ y ≤ 167. A suggestion was made to consider whether the function q(x) should be interpreted as the absolute value, |x² - 2|, which could align with the textbook's answer. Ultimately, the user confirmed their calculation was correct based on the given definitions. The conversation highlights the importance of precise function definitions in determining ranges.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Function p and q are defined by:

p (x) = 3x2+1, x∈R, Domain 0≤x≤2
q (x) = x2 - 2, x∈R

(q∘p) - State the range:

I got -1 ≤ y ≤ 167

The book says 0 ≤ y ≤ 167

Any idea where I went wrong?

The composite function I got so then I could sub was:
9x4 + 6x2 - 1

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks good to me.

Are you sure q(x) is not |x2 - 2| ?
 
The notation exactly how it is in the book is the following:
q : x → x2-2, x∈R
 
Looks fine. |x2 - 2| was the simplest way I could see to get the book answer, so you appear to be correct: Range = [-1, 167] .
 
Cool :smile:

Thanks a lot SammyS

And, if you don't mind, what are those two vertical lines?
 
Absolute value .
 
Back
Top