Why Does <n',l',m'|\hat{z}|n,l,m> Equal Zero Unless m=m'?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the matrix element <n',l',m'|\hat{z}|n,l,m> equals zero unless m equals m'. The user expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the lack of simple eigenvalues for the operator \hat{z}. They consider the normalization of spherical harmonics and their relationship with Legendre polynomials but struggle to connect this to the operator \hat{z}. A suggestion is made to evaluate the inner product as an integral, which shifts the perspective from an operator-based approach to a more straightforward calculation. This insight helps clarify the solution process for the problem at hand.
z2394
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to show that <n',l',m'|\hat{z}|n,l,m> = 0 unless m=m', using the form of the spherical harmonics.


Homework Equations


Equations for spherical harmonics


The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure how to begin here since there aren't any simple eigenvalues for \hat{z}|n,l,m>. I have a feeling that it may have something to do with normalization of the spherical harmonics (because they have Legendre polynomials that are P(cosΘ) = P(z) and would also give you a exp(imø)*exp(im'ø) term), but I have no idea how this could actually give you something for \hat{z}as an operator, or something you could actually use to figure out \hat{z}|n,l,m>.

Any help at all would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You essentially have the answer already. In the coordinate basis, the operator ##\hat{z}## is represented by ##r\cos\theta##. Just write down the integral for the inner product and evaluate it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks! I guess I was thinking about it in an operator sense, so it had not occurred to me to do it as an integral instead.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top