Why Does Recalculating Resistance of Resistors Yield Different Results?

Philip Wong
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
hi guys,
I know this sound strange but it did happen. I was working on a question asking about calculating the resistance of a resistors, using different material one is copper and another is aluminium. I got the right answer, and wrote down the formula and steps that I used. But then I only didn't put in the values that I actually used. Just formula, steps and answer. Now when I come back to look at it again, I couldn't get the same answer that I originally correct. Either could I back track how I did it, so I hope someone can point it out to me, how I did it in the first place, and did I do it right then.

Homework Statement


a 20mm long piece of copper wire (sigma = 5.8*10^7 (ohm.m)^-1) with a diameter of 0.01mm is used as a resistor. you want to design a resistor with the same resistance but the only wire avaiable to you is an aluminium wire (sigma = 3.4*10^7)ohm.m)^-1) with diameter 0.02 mm. calculate the length for the piece of aluminium wire for which the two resistances are the same


Homework Equations


R = pL/A


The Attempt at a Solution


the steps that I wrote down original listed below, and I haven't put in the fitted values then, but as I tries to put in all the values in again, I didn't get a consistence result.

Rcu = pL/A
= L/ (sigma* A)
= (L/sigma) (4/ pi d^2)
=4.39ohm

Values I used to reattempt to get answer:
L = 20mm = 0.02m
sigma = 5.8*10^7
d = (0.01*10-3) ^2

Rcu = (0.02/(5.8*10^7)) * (4/ (pi*(.01*10^-3)^2



Why...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philip Wong said:
hi guys,

Rcu = pL/A
= L/ (sigma* A)
= (L/sigma) (4/ pi d^2)
=4.39ohm

Values I used to reattempt to get answer:
L = 20mm = 0.02m
sigma = 5.8*10^7
d = (0.01*10-3) ^2

Rcu = (0.02/(5.8*10^7)) * (4/ (pi*(.01*10^-3)^2
Why...?

R = ρL/A

RCu = ρ(Cu)L1/A1 = ρ(Al)L2/A2 = R(Al)

Substitute the values and find L2
 
I think you must be plugging it into your calculator incorrectly. I just got the same answer you got originally.
 
vela said:
I think you must be plugging it into your calculator incorrectly. I just got the same answer you got originally.

ohh! indeed i have made a mistake at input my values. because I recalculated it everything, this time I've got a consistent answer.

ahaha! thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top