Why Does the Integral Equal Zero in Parallel Axis Theorem Proof?

AI Thread Summary
The integral equals zero in the Parallel Axis Theorem proof because it is evaluated around the center of mass, which is shifted to the origin using new variables x' and y'. This transformation simplifies the calculations, as the center of mass coordinates (XCM, YCM) are set to (0,0). Consequently, the integrals representing the moments about the center of mass yield zero, aligning with the definition of the center of mass. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the coordinate system used in the proof. This explanation clarifies the reasoning behind the integral's value in the theorem.
serverxeon
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Note: The following are taken from Physics for Scientists and Engineers 6E

http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/821/75796098.png
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/5615/70724407.png
http://img804.imageshack.us/img804/6813/65815357.png

I don't really understand why is that integral equals to 0.

Can anyone explain? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This illustration is not very clear about the order of what it is intending to describe with respect to the equations it asserts...
The drawing implies that the first and last Integrals of the line in question are taken from a coordinate system where the center of mass is at the point (XCM,YCM).
To Prove P.A.T. They create two new variables x' and y' which are equal to (X - XCM) and (Y - YCM) and this in practice essentially shifts the center of mass to the point (0,0) with respect to x' and y'. Since the last line is taken with respect to the Origin, the two middle integrals equate to, by definition of the center of mass, 0 + 0 because the center of mass is essentially at (0,0). I hope this helps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top