Why Does the Momentum Operator Yield Different Results in Rotations?

Laura08
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, sorry I am new to this forum, I hope I found the right category. I have a question about the momentum operator as in Sakurai's "modern quantum mechanics" on p. 196

If I let

1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi L_{z} = 1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi (xp_{y}-yp_{x})

act on an eigenket | x,y,z \rangle

why do I get | x-yd\phi,y+xd\phi,z \rangle

and not | x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle ,

with the momentum operators

p_{x}=\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} , p_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you show us why you think that would yeild:

| x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle

?
 
I just use the operator on each component:

[1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi (xp_{y}-yp_{x})] | x,y,z \rangle =

[1-d\phi (x \frac{\partial}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial}{\partial x})] | x,y,z \rangle =

|x-d\phi (x \frac{\partial x}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial x}{\partial x}),y-d\phi (x \frac{\partial y}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}),z-d\phi (x \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}) \rangle =

|x-d\phi (0-y),y-d\phi (x-0),z-d\phi (0-0) \rangle =

| x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle
 
Isn't that the correct answer?
 
Well, I think the calculation is correct, but then I did a backwards rotation, which I didn't intend to do.
The rotation matrix for an infinitesimal rotation about the z-axis is (if I rotate the vector, not the system)

<br /> R_{z}(d\phi) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; -d\phi &amp; 0\\<br /> d\phi &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right), R_{z}(d\phi)^{-1} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; d\phi &amp; 0\\<br /> -d\phi &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right)

So | x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle = R_{z}(d\phi)^{-1}| x,y,z \rangle

Yet if you try to determine the quantum mechanical operator for an infinitesimal rotation around the z-axis, starting with

\hat{R}| x,y,z \rangle = | x-yd\phi,y+xd\phi,z \rangle

(as done e.g. here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_operator" , you find

\hat{R} = 1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi L_{z}

And then inserting this result for \hat{R} leads me back to my problem...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top