Why Does the Momentum Operator Yield Different Results in Rotations?

Laura08
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, sorry I am new to this forum, I hope I found the right category. I have a question about the momentum operator as in Sakurai's "modern quantum mechanics" on p. 196

If I let

1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi L_{z} = 1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi (xp_{y}-yp_{x})

act on an eigenket | x,y,z \rangle

why do I get | x-yd\phi,y+xd\phi,z \rangle

and not | x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle ,

with the momentum operators

p_{x}=\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} , p_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you show us why you think that would yeild:

| x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle

?
 
I just use the operator on each component:

[1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi (xp_{y}-yp_{x})] | x,y,z \rangle =

[1-d\phi (x \frac{\partial}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial}{\partial x})] | x,y,z \rangle =

|x-d\phi (x \frac{\partial x}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial x}{\partial x}),y-d\phi (x \frac{\partial y}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial y}{\partial x}),z-d\phi (x \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}-y \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}) \rangle =

|x-d\phi (0-y),y-d\phi (x-0),z-d\phi (0-0) \rangle =

| x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle
 
Isn't that the correct answer?
 
Well, I think the calculation is correct, but then I did a backwards rotation, which I didn't intend to do.
The rotation matrix for an infinitesimal rotation about the z-axis is (if I rotate the vector, not the system)

<br /> R_{z}(d\phi) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; -d\phi &amp; 0\\<br /> d\phi &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right), R_{z}(d\phi)^{-1} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; d\phi &amp; 0\\<br /> -d\phi &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right)

So | x+yd\phi,y-xd\phi,z \rangle = R_{z}(d\phi)^{-1}| x,y,z \rangle

Yet if you try to determine the quantum mechanical operator for an infinitesimal rotation around the z-axis, starting with

\hat{R}| x,y,z \rangle = | x-yd\phi,y+xd\phi,z \rangle

(as done e.g. here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_operator" , you find

\hat{R} = 1-\frac{i}{\hbar} d\phi L_{z}

And then inserting this result for \hat{R} leads me back to my problem...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top