Why does the Rankine cycle require the condensation of water before reheating?

AI Thread Summary
The Rankine cycle requires the condensation of water before reheating to ensure efficient phase change from steam to liquid, as liquid water is easier to pump back into the boiler than steam. This process minimizes the risk of cavitation in pumps, which can occur if any gaseous phase remains, potentially damaging the equipment. Although it may seem that feeding higher temperature water directly to the boiler could save energy, the additional power needed to pump steam outweighs the benefits. The condenser's role is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency and protecting the pumping system. Overall, complete condensation is essential for optimal performance in steam power plants.
fred2028
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
In a Rankine cycle such as a steam power plant, why does the liquid (water) have be condensed before being reheated first? Isn't the Q just extracted during the condensation stage, wasted into a nearby reservoir, and then re-added in the boiler? Could this water not be fed straight to the boiler, and because it is at a higher temperature than fully condensed water, would require less W to heat it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When the working fluid (water, or steam more precisely) exits the turbine, it is still in a gaseous state. The function of the condenser is to perform the phase change of the steam back into liquid water. Liquid water takes less power to pump back into the boiler than steam does.
 
What SteamKing said seems like a good answer, I'd just like to add one thing: Pumps like to work in either a fully liquid or fully gaseous regime. This is why the condenser completely condenses the working fluid. If the working fluid were to have some gaseous component to it, you run the risk of cavitation occurring in your pump, which will kill the pump rather quickly.
 
SteamKing said:
When the working fluid (water, or steam more precisely) exits the turbine, it is still in a gaseous state. The function of the condenser is to perform the phase change of the steam back into liquid water. Liquid water takes less power to pump back into the boiler than steam does.
Thanks, so in this case, the pumping would require more power than the amount of power the condenser and boiler would save?
njardus said:
What SteamKing said seems like a good answer, I'd just like to add one thing: Pumps like to work in either a fully liquid or fully gaseous regime. This is why the condenser completely condenses the working fluid. If the working fluid were to have some gaseous component to it, you run the risk of cavitation occurring in your pump, which will kill the pump rather quickly.
Thanks for the reply!
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...

Similar threads

Back
Top