Why Does Using W=QV Give the Wrong Answer for Work Done in Charging a Capacitor?

AI Thread Summary
Using W=QV to calculate work done in charging a capacitor is incorrect because voltage and charge are not constant during the charging process. The correct approach involves integrating the differential form of the equation, which accounts for the changing voltage as the capacitor charges. The energy stored in the capacitor can be accurately calculated using the formula U = 0.5CV^2. This method yields the correct result, while the simpler W=QV approach leads to an incorrect answer. Understanding the need for integration is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
CaneAA
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Calculate the work done by a 3.0V battery as it charges a 7.8-microFarad capacitor in the flash unit of a camera.

The Attempt at a Solution



I realize that Work = Energy. And by using U = .5CV^2 I can easily come up with the answer.

But when I first started doing the problem, I tried doing it by a more convoluted approach--which made sense to me, but I got the wrong answer. I just wanted to know why the following way of solving the problem doesn't also work:

W = U (energy)
V = 3 V
C = 7.8 x 10^-6 F

Using the equation C = Q/V, I solved for Q (charge). Q= 2.34 x 10^-5 C.

Since W = QV, I multiplied (2.34 x 10^-5)(3) = 7.02 x 10^-5 as my answer (which is wrong). I wanted to know what is wrong with my reasoning, so I don't make the same mistake again.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good question CaneAA (and welcome to physics forums).

The problem is that the voltage and charge aren't constant, thus you would have to integrate (the differential form of) that equation to solve. If you're not familiar with calculus, I wouldn't worry about it; if you're curious however, check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor#Energy_storage and it shows you that by integrating you end up with the same equation that you used to get the correct answer.
 
Thank you, that made sense. :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top