Why Doesn't Electron Shielding Block RF Radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of protons in a magnetic field and the concept of shielding by electrons. It explains that protons align easily with a magnetic field when unshielded, requiring more energy to shift to an opposite spin state. In contrast, when electrons provide shielding, the proton experiences a reduced magnetic effect and requires less energy to flip its spin. However, the confusion arises regarding why electrons do not shield protons from RF radiation, despite their interaction with other forms of radiation like infrared. The clarification provided indicates that the term "shielding" refers specifically to how nearby electrons influence a proton's local magnetic environment, reducing the magnetic field's effect on the proton without absorbing energy. This distinction highlights that shielding does not relate to the penetration of RF energy, which remains unaffected by the electron shielding in this context.
CuriousBanker
Messages
190
Reaction score
24
TL;DR Summary
I understand why shielding lowers the effect of a magnetic field, but why doesn't it lower the effect of RF radiation?
I am watching this video;

at the 8:20 mark it shows that a proton in a magnetic field will align with the magnetic field very easily if there is no shielding from electrons, and therefore will require energy to shift to the opposite spin state; makes sense to me. I also understand that when there is more shielding, the proton will be less effected by the magnetic field and therefore will require less energy to move it to the opposite spin state. What I don't understand, is why don't the electrons shield the proton from the RF radiation? Electrons are effected by radiation (hence IR spectroscopy), so I'm curious as to why the RF radiation is not also shielded by the electrons. With no shielding it takes more energy to spin, but there is less shielding to block the radiation. With shielding it requires less energy to spin, but there is more shielding to block the radiation, so why isn't the same amount of radiation required to bring both nuclei into resonance? I'm guessing the answer is that RF radiation is not absorbed by electrons, whereas IR is? I don't know anything about the different types of radiation, or QM, so that's probably where my ignorance lies.

Thank you in advance
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I only have a elementary knowledge of NMR but I think you are misinterpreting the use of the terms shielding/deshielding. I know when we talk about shielding we naturally think of the absorption of radiation or energy. But here the term is used only for the affect of nearby electrons on a proton's local magnetic environment. This "shielding" effect of the electrons reduces the local magnetic field near the proton under question. That is the shielding electrons counteract the applied magnetic field so that the energy needed to "flip" the magnetic moment is less than if the the proton is "out in the open" deshielded so to speak experiencing the full affect of the applied magnetic field. This shielding does not absorb energy. The use of the term shielding is irrelevant to the penetration of the applied RF energy to the proton.
 
Short answer to the point and easy to understand. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top