Why doesn't my air vacuum device work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of using a compressed air can to create a vacuum effect in a secondary container while also drawing in ambient particulates. The user attempted to pressurize a gallon milk container but did not achieve the desired 'sucking' effect, likely due to the pressure differential being insufficient. The lack of valves and the pressure in the secondary container being higher than ambient pressure are identified as potential issues. Suggestions include increasing gas flow speed by narrowing the pipe's cross-section and ensuring the source pressure is adequate to compress the aerosol. Understanding the venturi effect is crucial, as it indicates that the static pressure at the air intake must be lower than the pressure in the tube for effective operation.
GreenAce92
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I think I sort of know the answer but I'm still wondering how I can achieve what I want to achieve.

I basically want to use the stored 'work' in the compressed air can to pressurize a different container and while doing so, taking in particulates from the ambient air to be contained into the new container.

I tried this with a can of compressed air computer cleaner (flurocarbons) and a container of a gallon of milk, the pressurization was fine but the 'sucking' did not occur.

I believe it is because the pressure in the new container is more than the ambient pressure, also without valves perhaps my idea has no hope of working...

This device is based on the atomizers of perfume bottles...what am I not understanding?

The secondary container (gallon of milk) is not equal to the compressed air can pressure, even starting from the beginning (ambient pressure in milk container) and starting the pressurization process, there is no 'vacuum effect' noticeable on the end of the perpendicular tube relative to the parallel high velocity flow... why? WHY! WHY!

When I tried this, there was some water in the gallon of milk container.

Anyway, I'd appreciate the help.
 

Attachments

  • depiction.jpg
    depiction.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 517
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not know why your device does not work. But you should be able to enhance the sucking effect by making the gas flow faster, for example by decreasing the cross-section of the pipe in the place where the liquid enters. Also, if the final container is closed, you may need greater pressure in source to be able to compress the resulting aerosol into the container.
 
You are correct: the venturi effect makes the static pressure at the "ambient air" opening lower than in the tube from the compressed air can to the container, but it is probably still higher than atmospheric pressure.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top