Why doesn't my result yield 9.8 m/s^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Henrybar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Yield
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of a ball's acceleration after falling 45 meters in 3 seconds, yielding an acceleration of 10 m/s². Participants clarify that while the expected acceleration due to gravity is approximately 9.8 m/s², introductory physics often rounds this to 10 m/s² for simplicity. The original poster questions whether their calculations are incorrect, but others confirm that their approach is valid given the problem's parameters. Additionally, it's noted that the problem does not specify that the ball is near Earth's surface, which could affect the expected acceleration value. Overall, the calculations align with the provided data, and assumptions about gravitational acceleration should be carefully considered.
Henrybar
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A ball falling from rest is located 45meters below its starting point 3.0s later. Assuming its acceleration is uniform, what is it's value? (air resistance is negligible)

Relevant Equations - Equations for uniformly accelerated motion
Δd=(v1 x Δt)+(a x Δt^2)/2

Attempt To solve:
v1= 0
Δd=45m
Δt=3.0s
a=?

a=(2Δd/Δt^2)-(2v1Δt/Δt^2)
a= ((2 x 45)/9)-((0 x 3)/9)
a=10m/s^2

If a ball is falling from rest(0 initial velocity) shouldn't it's acceleration be 9.8 seconds since gravity is constant? Is my equation wrong? Is my idea of time-acceleration misplaced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The given values result in the acceleration that you calculated. Your calculation is okay.

In introductory classes g is often approximated to be 10 m/s2 because it simplifies numerical calculations while still getting across the concepts being taught.
 
The question doesn't say the ball was near the surface of the earth. Don't make unjustified assumptions! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top