Why Doesn't the Water Level Decrease When an Ice Cube Melts?

AI Thread Summary
When an ice cube melts in a glass of water, the water level remains unchanged because the weight of the ice cube equals the weight of the water it displaces. Although ice has a lower density than water, the volume of water produced from the melted ice matches the volume of water displaced while the ice was floating. The portion of the ice cube above water does not affect the overall displacement, as only the submerged part contributes to the water level. Archimedes' principle confirms that any floating object displaces its own weight in fluid, ensuring the water level stays constant. Thus, the water level does not decrease when the ice cube melts.
Sam2847
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Consider a floating ice cube in a glass of water.

I know that the weight of the ice cube is equal to the weight of the water displaced.
This would mean that if the ice cube melted, the volume of water melted would be less than the volume of the ice cube, because ice has a lower density than water. As a result, the volume of water in the glass should decrease.

If this is the case, then why does the water level in the glass remain the same, rather than decreasing?

*Does it have something to do with the part of the the ice cube floating above water, which would account for the greater volume before melting? That way the total volume would still decrease after melting, but the water level would still remain the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, *yes
 


does the water level change measurably if you submerge the ice with a safety pin?
 


Proposition 5 of Archimedes' treatise On Floating Bodies states that:

Any floating object displaces its own weight of fluid.
— Archimedes of Syracuse[2]

Volume displaced = volume submerged.
Volume displaced = ice converted to water. Since the weights are the same.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top