Why doesn't this method work? (Re: Simultaneous ODEs)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoplite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Odes Work
Hoplite
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I have been working on a derivation in which the following simultateous ordinary differential equations have appeared:
f^{(4)}(x)-2 a^2 f''(x)+a^4 f(x)+b(g''(x)-a^2 g(x))=0,
g^{(4)}(x)-2 a^2 g''(x)+a^4 g(x)-b(f''(x)-a^2 f(x))=0,
where a and b are constants. I figured that I could solve this using Fourier transforms. First, I transform the above, using \nu as the transform space analogue of x, into the following:
(\nu^2 +a^2 )\hat f(\nu ) -b \hat g(\nu )=0,
(\nu^2 +a^2 )\hat g(\nu ) +b \hat f(\nu )=0.
I then rearrange these equations via substitution into
[(\nu^2 +a^2 )^2 +b^2 ] \hat f(\nu ) =0,
[(\nu^2 +a^2 )^2 +b^2 ] \hat g(\nu )=0.
Taking the inverse Fourier transform then results in
f^{(4)}(x)-2a^2 f''(x)+(a^4 +b^2 )f(x)=0,
g^{(4)}(x)-2a^2 g''(x)+(a^4 +b^2 )g(x)=0.

However, after I solve for these two ODEs using the boundary conditions, I find that the resulting answer is erroneous. I can only conclude that the above methodoly doesn't work, although I can't see why.

Could anyone point out the mathematical error in the above steps?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
can you show your transform... shouldn't you get factors of nu^4?
 
Last edited:
The OP is dividing out a common factor of \nu^2+a^2.
 
vela said:
The OP is dividing out a common factor of \nu^2+a^2.
Yes, that's what I've done.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top