Why E's representation marix is unit matrix

AI Thread Summary
In group representation theory, the identity element's representation matrix is the unit matrix because it must satisfy the property that multiplying any matrix A by the identity matrix E results in A. This means that for the identity element e, represented by matrix E, the equations AE = A and EA = A hold true for all group members represented by matrix A. The identity matrix is the only matrix that fulfills these conditions, confirming that E must be the unit matrix. The discussion seeks a formal proof of this concept, emphasizing the foundational role of the identity element in group representations. Understanding this relationship is crucial for deeper insights into the structure of group representations.
xiaoxiaoyu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In group representation theory, identity element's representation matrix is unit matrix. But why? Could you give me an exact explanation? Thany you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

Group representation theory essentially boils down to using matrices to represent group elements. In other words, a group is described as a set of linear transformations on vector spaces. In this respect it is obvious that the identity element will be the identity matrix.
 
I know this, but I don't know how to prove that exactly
 
The group identity has the property that ae= a and ea= a for any group member a. Suppose e is "represented" by the matrix E and a by the matrix A. Then you must have AE= A and EA= A, for any matrix, A, in the group representation. Therefore E= ?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top