Why Higgs produces different masses for electron and muon

bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
Elementary fermions get their mass from the Higgs field. The electron and the muon have the same charge, i.e., the same coupling to the electroweak interaction. If these two particles are identical except for mass, then how can the Higgs mechanism give rise to different masses for them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All interaction terms Higgs field <-> fermions have independent coupling parameters.
 
The popular notion that the Higgs field "gives mass" to fermions is misleading. The mass term is actually a product vC where v is the value of the Higgs field (246 GeV) and C is a constant different for each particle and of unknown origin. The Higgs field v only permits the masses to be nonzero. Their actual values depend on BSM physics which gives them mass, encapsulated in the C's.
 
  • Like
Likes exponent137
Thanks for the replies. That seems like an extremely ugly and unsatisfactory situation.
 
Ugly it is.

To be fair, the SM accommodates fermion masses even without the Higgs mechanism, provided you don't need to renormalize. When you renormalize, you get the condition that the mass from the Higgs mechanism is proportional to the de novo mass, which is even uglier, so most folks prefer to think that the non-Higgs component of the mass is zero, and the only mass comes from the Higgs.

So essentially, you replace a bunch of random masses in the theory with a bunch of random Yukawa couplings in the theory.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top