Why, IF electrons really orbited atoms, would they lose energy?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons orbiting atoms would lose energy due to their changing electric fields, which result from their motion. As an electron moves, it creates a varying electric field that leads to the emission of light. This process is linked to the principles of electromagnetism, where a changing magnetic field induces a changing electric field. The discussion emphasizes that a moving charge alters the electric field at fixed points in space, confirming that the electron's position affects the field's strength and direction. Ultimately, this dynamic interaction explains why orbiting electrons would lose energy over time.
bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Why, IF electrons really orbited atoms, would they lose energy?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I realize they're meant to emit light. But why? I understand vaguely that the E field might be changing with time, since you have a changing magnetic flux... but where does the changing E field come from? Unless I guess it's just a self supporting process (changing B field *causes* changing E here...) - is that just what a light ray is??

Many Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw up a picture of a simple atom, like a hydrogen atom. Ignore the contribution from the atom core to the electric field.

Pick a random point and write down the electric field in that point, draw it again after half a period (For the orbiting electron).

Will the electric field be different in the two pictures.
 
Oh right, for sure. The electron is at a different distance from the point! Sorry!
 
A moving charge always produces a changing E field, that should be obvious. Take any fixed point P in space. At some time, the charge Q is at distance A from P. At some other time, Q is at distance B from P. Because A and B are different, the E field at P must also be different.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top