Why in Huygens–Fresnel, Point source should be as small as wavelength?

AI Thread Summary
In the Huygens–Fresnel principle, each point on an aperture is treated as a point source of light to analyze diffraction patterns. The size of these point sources should ideally be comparable to the wavelength to avoid them becoming extended sources, which would distort results. A size slightly smaller than the wavelength, such as a quarter wavelength, is suggested for practical simulation purposes. The definition of a point source indicates it should be significantly smaller than the wavelength, although the concept of a point having zero size complicates practical applications. Clarification on the simulation's mechanics would enhance understanding of how these point sources are implemented.
payam
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In Huygens–Fresnel principle, to configure the diffraction pattern after an aperture, we need to consider each point on aperture as a point source of light.
I need to make a simulation for diffraction. Here I will need to introduce the size of each point source.
my question is why the size of these point sources should be as large as the used wavelength ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because if they were any larger they would be extended sources - not point sources - affecting the results, and if they were smaller your simulation would take longer than necessary to run. I would use a size a bit smaller to be on the safe side. A quarter wavelength seems appropriate.
 
Thanks Dauto.
So there is a definition for point source in terms of angular divergence?
what is the definition of a point source?
 
payam said:
Thanks Dauto.
So there is a definition for point source in terms of angular divergence?
what is the definition of a point source?

A point source is a source significantly smaller than the wavelength of the radiation being emitted. Otherwise it is an extended source.
 
payam said:
Here I will need to introduce the size of each point source.

:confused: By definition, a point has zero size, doesn't it?
 
jtbell said:
:confused: By definition, a point has zero size, doesn't it?

Yes, it does, but (s)he is talking about some kind of simulation. It's not exactly clear how the simulation works but it is conceivable that an infinite number of point sources could be replaced with a finite number of extended sources and as long as the sizes are comparable to the wavelength or smaller the simulation might produce viable results. Again, not knowing exactly how the simulation is supposed to work, I'm going out on a limb trying to make sense of it. May be the OP should explain the simulation better?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top