Why in SUSY we tend to use 2- components

  • Thread starter Thread starter Safinaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Susy
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

why in SUSY we tend to use 2- components Weyl spinor field
not the ordinary Dirac filed ..

Regards,
Safinaz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's also easier to work in the Standard Model using Weyl spinors instead of Dirac spinors. That's because the left handed Weyl spinors and the right handed Weyl spinors belong to two different representations of the electroweak gauge group. It makes more sense to deal with them separately.
 
Is that also to match the transformation from 2- complex components scalar filed (4-degrees of freedom)
to 2- components Weyl spinor filed which are also complex so we have 4-degrees of freedom as well, instead
of Dirac filed which will be twice ..
 
Yes, one Dirac field with four degrees of freedom corresponds to two Weyl fields with two degrees each.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top