Why is a gyroscope's precession fastest at 45 degrees?

AI Thread Summary
An experiment varying the starting angle of elevation of a gyroscope revealed that the precessional period is lowest at 45 degrees, resembling half a sinusoidal curve. At 0 degrees and 75 degrees, the precessional period is higher, indicating a relationship between angle and spin speed. The discussion raises questions about the role of centrifugal force at different angles, with a claim that at 45 degrees, centrifugal force is about 70.7% of that at horizontal. The concept of centrifugal force is debated, with some skepticism about its existence. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for further exploration of gyroscopic behavior.
maddiedoncher
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I did an experiment in which I varied the starting angle of elevation of a gyroscope. I noticed that at 45 degrees, the precessional period (amount of time to perform one spin) is the lowest, while at 0 degrees and 75 degrees, the precessional period is higher. If I plotted this on a graph, it looks somewhat like half a sinusoidal curve, with 45 degrees being the minimum.

Keep in mind that the starting angular frequency of the rotor/wheel in the gyroscope is always the same in the beginning.

I just want to know why a gyroscope tends to spin faster at 45 degrees.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a centrifugal force that acts on the rotor? I found on a website:

http://www.gyroscopes.org/forum/questions.asp?id=1533

"The centrifugal force when the arm is at 45 degrees above or below horizontal would be about 70.7 percent of what it is at horizontal. Of course the centrifugal force would vary for every angle above or below horizontal for a fixed precession rpm. If you plotted the calculated centrifugal force for varying angles at a fixed precession rpm, the graph would be 1/2 a sinusoid."Can anyone verify this? I didn't think centrifugal forces existed.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top