Why is A0=1 in the Frobenius Method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frobenius Method
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
for the frobenius method, why do you suppose that a0=1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't. You assume that it is non-zero which is just a choice of "c".

The idea of Frobenius method is to write a solution in the form
\Sigma_{n=0}{\infnty}a_n x^{n+c}
where c, while a constant, is not necessarily a positive integer.
If I, choosing c to be, say, c0[/sup], I find that a0= 0 but a1 is not, I could just take c= c0+ 1 instead.
 
thank you very much! :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
779
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top