Why is Angular Momentum Conserved in This Collision?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on angular momentum conservation during a collision, a ball with mass m and moment of inertia I = 2/5mr^2 is analyzed as it rolls towards a wall. The collision is brief, allowing for the neglect of external forces like gravity and friction, focusing solely on the interaction between the ball and the wall. Angular momentum is conserved with respect to the point of tangency, leading to the equation I'ω' = constant. The discussion clarifies the relationship between this equation and the expression Iω + mv_y r = constant, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding the axis of inertia calculation. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in understanding angular momentum conservation in collision scenarios.
marcnn
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
(Based on a problem from the 59th Polish Olympiad in Physics, 2009)

Let's consider a ball of mass ##m##, radius ##r## and moment of inertia ##I = 2/5mr^2## approaching a wall with linear velocity ##v_0##, rolling without sliding with angular velocity ##\omega_0##. It collides with a wall.

Its collision with the wall is very short, so we may consider only the forces acting between the wall and the ball (neglecting the gravity, the floor's reaction and the friction between the floor and the ball).

Thus the angular momentum wrt to the axis of ball's tangency to the wall is conserved, so
$$I'\omega' = \mathrm{const}~~~~ (1)$$
where ##I'## is the moment of inertia wrt to that axis and ##\omega'## - angular velocity wrt to that axis.

Why is the formula (1) equivalent to
$$I \omega + m v_y r = \mathrm{const} ~~~~ (2)$$ where ##\omega## is the angular velocity of the ball wrt to the mass center, ##v_y## the vertical component of the mass center velocity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess $$I'$$ is your moment of inertia, not the angular momentum as you are saying. There is a also a little ambiguity about the axis wrt to which $$I'$$ is calculated.
 
Yep, I made a typo :)

##I'## is calculated to wrt to the axis which goes through the point of tangency to the wall and is parallel to the floor, I guess. The official solution of the corresponding problem isn't clear either :)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top