Why is Block B not experiencing a normal force in this static friction problem?

AI Thread Summary
Block B does not experience a normal force from the ground when it begins to slip upward because, at that point, it is no longer in contact with the ground. The discussion clarifies that for block C to move, block B must lift, which eliminates the normal force acting on block B. The participants note that the assumption of block A not moving is not part of the problem's original specification and is merely a consequence of the scenario being analyzed. Additionally, the weight of block A relative to block B plays a crucial role, as a lighter block A could slide instead of block B rising. Overall, the dynamics of the blocks depend on their weights and the applied forces, leading to different movement scenarios.
OmniNewton
Messages
105
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


How come for the following image when I assume block B slips up, block A does not move. The free body diagram at block B does not have a normal from the ground. This is a static friction problem.
c8159d667350baaca3628c32559c52fb.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


No relevant equations all theory[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


This should be the Free body diagram but why does B have no normal from the ground when this assumption is made?
9125af555fd21b6e87a783fb1a808f7c.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OmniNewton said:

Homework Statement


How come for the following image when I assume block B slips up, block A does not move. The free body diagram at block B does not have a normal from the ground. This is a static friction problem.
c8159d667350baaca3628c32559c52fb.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


No relevant equations all theory[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


This should be the Free body diagram but why does B have no normal from the ground when this assumption is made?
9125af555fd21b6e87a783fb1a808f7c.png

It's not clear what the original problem statement was, since you didn't provide it.

When blocks A and C are forced together, block B is going to slide upwards on the sloped face of block C. Once Block B is just a minute distance off the ground, there is no more normal force on the block from that direction.
 
  • Like
Likes OmniNewton
I would assume if block B is slipping up, it is no longer in contact with the ground and therefore there cannot be a normal force.
 
  • Like
Likes OmniNewton
The original problem statement was:
The three stone blocks have weights of 60lb 150lb and 40 lb respectively Determine the smallest horizontal force P that must be applied to block C in order to move this block. The coefficient of static friction between the blocks is 0.3 and between the floor is 0.5
 
Based on the question, the only way to move C, is to lift B. Therefore, no normal.
 
  • Like
Likes OmniNewton
rpthomps said:
Based on the question, the only way to move C, is to lift B. Therefore, no normal.
Excellent, thank you that is what I thought. I did the question originally assuming the normal and the system was statically indeterminate I was unsure how to solve until I was told this FBD did not contain a normal but I was unsure as to why
 
  • Like
Likes rpthomps
rpthomps said:
Based on the question, the only way to move C, is to lift B. Therefore, no normal.
Is that from checking with the actual numbers? With some combinations of weights etc., the three blocks would slide horizontally, no lifting.
 
haruspex said:
Is that from checking with the actual numbers? With some combinations of weights etc., the three blocks would slide horizontally, no lifting.

No, I didn't use numbers. I was trying to visualize the block moving without lifting...I couldn't see it.
 
  • Like
Likes OmniNewton
rpthomps said:
No, I didn't use numbers. I was trying to visualize the block moving without lifting...I couldn't see it.
Despite the way the blocks are drawn, block A is much lighter than block B. If it's light enough it will slide instead of B rising. It's easy to visualise - the three blocks slide as if one unit.
Note that the clause "block A does not move" in the OP is not part of the problem specification; it is an observed consequence of the assumption that B slides up.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Despite the way the blocks are drawn, block A is much lighter than block B. If it's light enough it will slide instead of B rising. It's easy to visualise - the three blocks slide as if one unit.
Note that the clause "block A does not move" in the OP is not part of the problem specification; it is an observed consequence of the assumption that B slides up.

I guess I just latched onto the phrase Block A does not move. I am not sure if that was a part of the problem originally but that was the assumption I was basing my thoughts on. If it can move, I agree, there is a possibility that the whole unit could move together. In that case, yes I can visualize Block B traveling horizontally. :)
 
  • #11
rpthomps said:
I guess I just latched onto the phrase Block A does not move. I am not sure if that was a part of the problem originally but that was the assumption I was basing my thoughts on. If it can move, I agree, there is a possibility that the whole unit could move together. In that case, yes I can visualize Block B traveling horizontally. :)
The actual problem statement appears to be in post #4.
 
Back
Top