Why is \frac{dN_i}{N}\neq dX_i when using the mole fraction concept?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical relationship between the ratios of quantities in a system, specifically addressing the equation \(\frac{N_i}{N}=X_i\) and the distinction that \(\frac{dN_i}{N}\neq dX_i\). The key point is that when \(N\) is the sum of all \(N_k\), any change in \(N_i\) affects the denominator \(N\), leading to a different differential \(dX_i\). The derived formula \(dx_i = \frac{{N \cdot dN_i - N_i \cdot dN}}{{N^2}}\) illustrates this relationship, while for small values of \(x_i\), the approximation \(dx_i = \frac{{dN_i}}{N}\) holds true, simplifying the analysis of changes in the system.
roldy
Messages
206
Reaction score
2
It looks like my first post on this did not make it on this forum some how.

I came across this statement.
Even though \frac{N_i}{N}=X_i, \frac{dN_i}{N}\neq dX_i

How does this work? The book offered no help as well as searches on the internet.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
My guess is that as N is sum of all Nk, if Ni changes, denominator changes as well.
 
I guess that makes sense. Seems logical to me.
 
Borek said:
My guess is that as N is sum of all Nk, if Ni changes, denominator changes as well.

Yep, that's it.

dx_i = \frac{{N \cdot dN_i - N_i \cdot dN}}{{N^2 }}

and

dN = dN_i

gives

dx_i = \frac{{N - N_i }}{{N^2 }} \cdot dN_i

But for small x_i

dx_i = \frac{{dN_i }}{N}

is a good approximation.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top