Why is Gravity Weak? Understanding the Fundamental Forces and Magnetism

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimeRip496
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Weak
AI Thread Summary
Gravity is considered weak compared to other fundamental forces, such as electromagnetism, which is significantly stronger at small scales. While gravity can hold large structures like skyscrapers together, it is the electrostatic bonds between atoms that primarily maintain their integrity. The repulsion between like poles of magnets occurs despite Earth's gravity because electromagnetic forces are vastly stronger than gravitational forces. Current understanding does not fully explain the differing magnitudes of fundamental forces, and theories involving higher dimensions remain unverified. Ultimately, the interplay of forces in a universe with balanced charges leads to gravity's dominance at larger scales.
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
Why am I able to repel two liked poles magnet despite the presence of Earth gravity? The Earth gravity is able to hold skyscrapers together but yet unable to prevent two magnets from repelling?

I know there is an explanation that says that unlike graviton, all the other fundamental forces are bound to the brane. Thus gravity is able to propagate into other dimensions resulting in what we experience the weaker gravity force.
I don't really get this but is there other way to explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a very similar current thread that you might want to look at.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-do-we-believe-gravity-to-be-a-weak-force.822059

Don't count on brane theory as having anything to with it, or any other theory involving higher dimensions.
Mathematical models of that sort exist but have not been experimentally verified in any way.

We don't yet know why the fundamental forces are different in magnitude, it's work in progress.

Also gravity is not the main force involved in keeping a skyscraper together, electrostatic bonds between atoms do that.
If you somehow teleport the skyscraper into interstellar space it will not suddenly disintegrate.
 
Last edited:
Best answer from the other thread:
Chalnoth said:
If you take two protons, the electrostatic repulsion between them will be some 1040 or so times stronger than their gravitational attraction. Gravity becomes significant at large scales only because the positive and negative electric charges cancel one another out, while gravity always adds.
In other words, in a universe full of only protons, or with stars made of protons and planets made of electrons, electromagnetism would dominate. But since the universe has a near equal number of protons and electons, those forces cancel out over very short distances whereas gravity always adds.
 
A number of off topic posts and replies to these posts have been deleted. I remind all members to please stay on topic.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...
Back
Top