Why is my book using different equations to solve for velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter outxbreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding two different equations used to solve for velocity in a physics book. Both equations, ΔK = −ΔU and ΔK = ΔU, essentially convey the same principle that the change in kinetic energy is related to the change in potential energy. The distinction arises from the context of the problems, where the signs of potential energy changes depend on whether the particle is moving up or down an electric potential. It is emphasized that in electromagnetics, it is often more practical to focus on the magnitudes of energy changes rather than their signs. Understanding when to apply each equation is crucial for accurately solving problems related to kinetic and potential energy.
outxbreak
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I am having a difficult time trying to figure out why my book says that I should solve for v by:
(1) Set the kinetic energy equal to the change in potential energy and solve for v

Then 3 problems later it says solve for v by:
(2)Set ΔK = −ΔU and solve for v

http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/1995/1idz.jpg


I just need to know why they are using different equations to solve for v.. this is not making any sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
outxbreak said:
I am having a difficult time trying to figure out why my book says that I should solve for v by:
(1) Set the kinetic energy equal to the change in potential energy and solve for v

Then 3 problems later it says solve for v by:
(2)Set ΔK = −ΔU and solve for v


I just need to know why they are using different equations to solve for v.. this is not making any sense.

They are essentially the same equations. ΔK = −ΔU means that the gain in kinetic energy is equal in magnitude to the decrease in potential energy.

The V (upper case) in problem 21 is the potential difference. The v (lower case) is the velocity of the charged particle.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
They are essentially the same equations. ΔK = −ΔU means that the gain in kinetic energy is equal in magnitude to the decrease in potential energy.


But how do I know when to use
ΔK = −ΔU
or
ΔK = ΔU

That is my problem. :'(
 
The book's being sloppy in the first case. It's really using ##\Delta K = \lvert \Delta U \rvert##. For both the electron and proton, the potential energy decreases, so ##\Delta U < 0##.

The proton rolls down electric potential hills, so Vfinal is less than Vinitial. ΔV is therefore negative, and ΔU = e ΔV is also negative. The electron rolls up electric potential hills, so Vfinal is greater than Vinitial. ΔV is therefore positive. The electron has a negative charges, so ΔU = -e ΔV again is negative. Because ΔU is negative, if you try to use ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \Delta U##, there'd be no real solution for v. You need to use ##\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = -\Delta U##. In other words, you always use ##\Delta K = -\Delta U##.

In electromagnetics, it's pretty easy to make sign mistakes if you try to rely solely on the math. It's often easier simply to neglect the signs and calculate the magnitude of quantities and then insert the correct sign based on physical intuition. For instance, in both cases here, we know that the particles are going to speed up, so their kinetic energy increases. This increase comes at the expense of a decrease in potential energy. To find the speed, we don't really care about the sign of ΔU; we just need its magnitude.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top