Why is My Calculation of Force on the Door Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a calculation error in determining the force required to move a large door. The original poster incorrectly calculated the angular displacement for 90 degrees, mistakenly using radians without proper conversion. They also miscalculated the angular acceleration and the resulting force, which led to an incorrect answer of 304.5 N instead of the correct 130 N. The error was identified as a misunderstanding of the relationship between radians and the radius in the context of rotational motion. The thread highlights the importance of accurate unit conversion in physics calculations.
SEG9585
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hey all--
Can someone try to ifnd what I'm doing wrong with this question, I must have sort of brain lapse in the middle of a 4-day weekend and all:

Question: A (very large) door has a mass of 44,000kg, and a rotational inertia about a vertical axis through its hingesof 8.7*10^4 kg*m^2, and has a front face of 2.4m. NEglecting friction, what steady force perpendicular to the door can move it from rest through an angle of 90 degrees in 30s?

My incorrect solution: ("@" refers to the angle in radian measure), and "&" refers to angular acceleration)

@ = 2(pi)*r/4 @=2.4(pi)/2 radians

@ = .5(&)(t^2)
1.2(pi) = .5(&)(30^2)
& = .0084 rad/s^2

I(&) = r x F = rFsin90
(8.7*10^4)(.0084) = (2.4)(F)(1)
F= 304.5 N

However, the actual answer is apparently 130N. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by SEG9585
However, the actual answer is apparently 130N. What did I do wrong?
How many radians in 90 degrees?
 
hah oops...yeah i knew i had a brain fart there (thinks all the way back to trig)
of course...radians don't change proportionally to radius...duhhh
Thanks Doc
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top