Why Is My Calculation of Rotational Inertia Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of three balls with different masses attached to a massless rod. The initial calculations yield a total rotational inertia of 3ML²/2, while the provided answer is 3ML²/4, leading to confusion. Participants agree on using the moment of inertia formula I = Σ(mir²) but suspect an arithmetic error or a flaw in the answer key. There's speculation about whether the distribution of mass in a sphere for the largest mass might affect the calculation, but the lack of a specified radius suggests it should not. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic and clarity in problem statements.
sskk221
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Three identical balls, with masses of M, 2M, and 3M, are fastened to a massless rod of length
L as shown. The rotational inertia about the left end of the rod is:

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/1424/1234sjy.jpg

Homework Equations



I = MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I total = (3M)(0)^2 + (2M)(L/2)^2 + (M)(L)^2

I total = 3ML^2/2

It says the answer is 3ML^2/4 though. Thanks for the help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes MD SHAHARIAZ ALAM
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm...

<br /> I = mr^{2}<br />

<br /> I = (3M)0^{2} + 2M(\frac{L}{2})^{2}) + ML^{2}<br />

Therefore;

<br /> I = \frac{1}{2}ML^{2} + ML^{2}<br />

<br /> I = \frac{3}{2} ML^{2}<br />

I get the same as you.

The definition of the moment of inertia is;

SUM( miri2 ) So I'm preaty certian that we are following the correct method. So perhaps it is some arithmetical mistake we are both making.

2/4 is 1/2 yes and 1/2mr2 + mr2 is mr2(1/2 + 1)
(1/2 + 1) = 3/2. Nope. I think your answer book might be flawed.

UNLESS you are meant to use the distribution of mass in a sphere for the first mass (3M). Mindyou, because they havn't given you a radius for the sphere I would assume not.

Haths
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top