Why is my mesh analysis incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The mesh analysis issue arises from a misunderstanding of how current sources affect mesh currents. The presence of two current sources in the circuit means that their values predetermine the mesh currents, eliminating the need to solve for them independently. Specifically, the 2mA current source fixes i1 at -2mA, which contradicts the calculated value of 10mA. The correct approach is to focus on the remaining loop and adjust the analysis accordingly. Understanding the influence of current sources is crucial for accurate mesh analysis.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


EDIT: I THINK I FIGURED IT OUT, JUST NEED SOMEONE TO CONFIRM. I think the reason why my mesh analysis is wrong is because there is a voltage drop across the current source. Am I right?

Here is the problem along with my attempt

Find Io using mesh analysis:
ssfsB.jpg


Alright so if you look at my second last and last line, i solved for i1 again to verify that my mesh was correct. However as you can see my i1 came out to be 10mA which is not the same as the i1 value that can be found by relating i1 to the 2mA current source (which is -2mA as you can see in the first line). Does anyone know what I am doing wrong? I am using the method that my professor went over in class where if you have a resistor for example in the second last line, you take the resistor and multiply it to the current difference between i3 and i1.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello TheBEAST, there are two current sources both of which are not shared between meshes, so in fact they predetermine the mesh currents for their loops. That means you begin with two out of three of the currents solved, and no need to write equations for them. For example, there's no point in trying to solve for i1 if the 2mA source has it fixed at -2mA.

So concentrate on the second loop.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top