Why Is My Numerical Solution for the Bound Orbit Not Matching the Expected Plot?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brainpushups
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Orbit
brainpushups
Messages
452
Reaction score
195

Homework Statement


Consider a particle with mass m and angular momentum l in the field of a central force F=\frac{-k}{r^{5/2}}. To simplify your equations, choose units for which m=l=k=1. a) find the value r_{0} of r at which U_{eff} is a minimum and make a plot of U_{eff}(r) for 0<r<5r_{0} b) Assuming now that the particle has energy E=-0.1 find an accurate value of r_{min}, the particle's distance of closest approach to the force center. c) Assuming that the particle is a r=r_{min} when ψ=0 use a computer program to solve the transformed radial equation and find the orbit in the form r=r(ψ) for 0≤ψ≤7π. Plot the orbit. Does it appear to be closed?

Homework Equations


The transformed radial equation: u''(ψ)=-u(ψ)-\frac{μ}{l^{2}u(ψ)^{2}}F comes from the radial equation of the orbit μr^{..}=F(r)+\frac{l^{2}}{μ r^{3}} by making the substitution u=1/r.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have completed everything but the final plot of the orbit and I'm not sure why it is giving me trouble.

To do part a) simply find where the derivative of the effective potential is equal to zero and solve for r. Using the suggested simplifications for the units it is easy to find that

r_{0}=1.

I plotted the effective potential in Mathematica along with the energy of the particle by defining U_{eff}(r)=-\frac{2}{3 r^{3/2}}+\frac{1}{2r^{2}} and then using

Plot[{Ueff[r],-0.1},{r,0,5}].

From the plot it is easy to see that the distance of closest approach is around 0.7 and if you find the roots you will see that it is r_{0}=0.6671.

Now, for part c) you need to write F(r) as F(u) using the substitution mentioned above. After simplification u''(ψ)=\sqrt{u(ψ)}-2u(ψ).

If this can be solved for u(ψ) then you can easily find r(ψ). I tried using Mathematica again to numerically solve and then plot the reciprocal of my solution. Part of the problem is that I wasn't sure what to use for my second initial condition, u'(0), but I tried several different numbers just to see if I could get a reasonable plot and I did not.

Anyway, here is what I entered

s=NDSolve[{u''[ψ]==\sqrt{u[ψ]}-2u[ψ], u[0]=1.499, u'[0]=1}, u, {ψ, 0, 7π}]

Here, u[0] comes from the fact that u=1/r and r0=0.667. Once again, I just picked a number for u'[0] but I have tried various selections.

To plot the solution

PolarPlot[Evaluate[1/u[ψ]/.s] ,{ψ,0,7π}]

The result is not the orbit (not closed) that is pictured in the back of the book, it is more or less a straight line. Not sure where I went wrong here and any help would be appreciated. To check that the technique was correct I did check my work with other examples that I knew the solution to (a free particle, and a particle under the influence of an inverse square force). I was able to get correct plots using the method described above for these.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
After playing around with Mathematica I found a plot that seemed to match the answer (this is problem 8.25 out of Classical Mechanics by Taylor). If you enter as the transformed radial equation

u''[ψ]=\sqrt{u[ψ]}-u[ψ] instead of u''[ψ]=\sqrt{u[ψ]}-2u[ψ] and use an initial condition that u'[0]=0 the orbit is indistinguishable from the one in the back of the book (on the given scale, at least).

However, it certainly doesn't appear that this is the correct transformed radial equation if you work through the math.

We have u''=-\frac{μ}{l^{2}u^{2}}F(u)-u

u''=-\frac{μ}{l^{2}u^{2}}(-u^{5/2}+u^{3})-u

With µ=1 l=1 we have

u''=u^{1/2}-u-u

u''=u^{1/2}-2u

What gives?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top