Why Is My Projectile Motion Calculation Using Two Angles Incorrect?

ChrisEffinSmi
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
First, I struggled with whether to put this in advanced or intro physics. I read the sticky, and since this is a 300 level class that is taken at the junior level in the physics BS program at my school, I put it here. If it's considered too simplistic for advanced physics, I apologize.

I've attempted a solution and come up with something painfully close to the desired result, and I have no idea where I'm going wrong. I would really appreciate some insight.


Homework Statement


http://usera.imagecave.com/hotrod73dart/homework/4.8.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


http://usera.imagecave.com/hotrod73dart/homework/4.8attempted.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer fits if you define "elevation" as being measured from horizontal and not from the slope as you have done it.
 
Oh gods! How stupid of me! My angle should be \alpha - \phi, not just \alpha. That makes my derived answer sin(\alpha-\phi)*cos(\alpha-\phi+\phi) = cos(\alpha)*sin(\alpha-\phi) which is, of course, the desired result. I should sleep more. Thanks for the reply!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top