Why is my water-to-wine reaction slow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brad12d3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the water to wine trick, specifically the delayed color change experienced by one user despite following the instructions accurately. The user suspects that the issue may be related to the type of laundry starch used, particularly its biodegradable properties, which might differ chemically from other starches. The conversation highlights the chemical reactions involved: iodide ions react with hydrogen peroxide to produce iodine, which turns blue in the presence of starch. However, Vitamin C initially reacts with iodine, keeping the solution colorless until it is depleted. The delayed reaction could be due to the gradual consumption of Vitamin C or the properties of the starch used. Participants suggest stirring the solutions before combining them and inquire about the specific ingredients in the starch that might affect the reaction time.
Brad12d3
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
OK, so I saw a video of someone doing the water to wine trick and just had to learn it. There are apparently a few different ways that this can be done,...but settled on this version: http://imaginationstationtoledo.org/content/2010/11/water-to-wine/

It's absolutely great, but for some reason when I do it, the change isn't nearly instantaneous. I followed the directions exactly but for some reason it takes several seconds for mine to change. I am curious as to why mine would act differently... I wondered if it had to do with the laundry starch I got. It mentions "biodegradable ingredient".. so I wonder if there is something chemically different about it than other starches?

Here's what I used the first time and then I went and picked up some other laundry starch at walmart that was concentrated. It still doesn't happen instantly though.

http://i61.tinypic.com/2psm539.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Brad12d3 said:
It's absolutely great, but for some reason when I do it, the change isn't nearly instantaneous. I followed the directions exactly but for some reason it takes several seconds for mine to change.
From one's description, it sounds like what is supposed to be a rapid transition is progressing more slowly. Some either the Vitamin C is being used up slowly, or the conversion of iodine is occurring slowly. I appears that there are two solutions in separate beakers initially. Perhaps one should stir the separate beakers first.
In Reaction # 1 iodide ions react with hydrogen peroxide to produce iodine element which is blue in the presence of starch. BUT, before that can actually happen, the Vitamin C quickly reacts and consumes the elemental iodine.

The net result, at least for part of the time is that the solution remains colorless with excess of iodide ions being present. Now after a short time as the reactions keep proceeding in this fashion, the Vitamin C gets gradually used up. Once the Vitamin C is used up, the solution turns blue, because now the iodine element and starch are present.
Considering what reactions take place, it could be either the Vitamin C or starch. What are the ingredients/additives in the starch.
 
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top