Why is the 1/2 term necessary in physics equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DecayProduct
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Origin Terms
AI Thread Summary
The "1/2" in physics equations like d=1/2at² arises from the need to account for average velocity during uniformly accelerated motion. When calculating distance (d) under constant acceleration, the average velocity is half of the final velocity, leading to the inclusion of the "1/2" factor. The discussion clarifies that in the equation d=vt, "v" represents average velocity, while in v=at, "v" is instantaneous velocity. This distinction is crucial for deriving accurate equations of motion, such as d = d₀ + v₀t + 1/2at². The concept of average versus instantaneous values is also relevant in understanding kinetic energy, where E=1/2mv² reflects the average energy associated with the squared velocity.
DecayProduct
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I'm curious as to the origin of the "1/2" in some of the basic equations in physics. For example, d=1/2at^{2}. If d=vt, and v=at, then d=at^{2}, yet in reality we need the "1/2". Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DecayProduct said:
For example, d=1/2at^{2}. If d=vt, and v=at, then d=at^{2}, yet in reality we need the "1/2". Why?

In d = vt, "v" is the average velocity during the time interval between time 0 and time t.

In v = at, "v" is the instantaneous velocity at time t.

With constant acceleration starting from rest, the average velocity during the time interval between time 0 and time t is v/2 = at/2 (where "v" is again the final velocity at time t).
 
In d = vt + d_0 your velocity is changing with time. The velocity in this equation should be the average velocity, call it v'.

v' = \frac{v_0+v}{2} => d = (v')t

In v = at + v_0 you're assuming constant acceleration so the average, a' is equal to a.

d = v't + d_0 = \frac{(v_0+v)t}{2} + d_0= \frac{(v_0 + at + v_0)t}{2} + d_0

So simplifying we get:

d = d_0 + v_0 t + \frac{1}{2}at^2
 
Thanks alot, that makes sense now, being the average. So how does it arise in E=1/2mv^{2}?
 
Kinetic energy is for instantaneous velocity. Just thinking about it you should get a contradiction if you take an average energy vs. an average velocity due to the velocity being squared.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top