Why is the 400Nm straight line drawn from the moment point in moment diagrams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chetzread
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram Moment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of a 400Nm moment in moment diagrams, questioning why it is depicted as a straight line from a specific point rather than extending along the entire beam. Participants debate whether the moment should be illustrated throughout the beam length, considering that moments can act at various points. It is noted that for the beam to remain in equilibrium, a counteracting moment must be applied at one end, but in this case, both ends do not restrict moments. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how moments affect beam behavior and equilibrium conditions. The clarity of moment application in diagrams is crucial for accurate structural analysis.
chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


for the moment diagram, why the 400Nm straight line is drawn from the point of moment to a only?
cnkrDOP.png

OHYU4Dr.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it wrong? I think it should be drawn throughout the entire length of beam? since moment can act at anywhere on the beam...[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
or the moment 400Nm will only causes the region from A to 2m away from A to break ? So , in the moment area diagram , it's drawn from A and 2m away from A ?
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/direction-of-moment.878803/#post-5520313

In the previous thread , i was told that to keep the beam in equilibrium, the moment has to be applied at the another end (wall)in opposite direction
But, in this question, i have 2 ends, namely A and B, but both point doesn't restrict moment, am i right?
In the previous therad, it's wall, so it can restrict moment...But , how about this case?@SteamKing
 
deleted
 
Back
Top