Why Is the Area Between Non-Hookean Material Graphs the Energy Lost?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abobaker Ugool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Material
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the energy lost in a non-Hookean material, specifically a polymer, during a practical experiment involving weight application. The area between the curves representing weight versus length stretched during loading and unloading is identified as the energy lost or work done, due to hysteresis in the material's response. The tangents at various points on the curve serve as approximations of the spring constant, reflecting how the material's stiffness changes with deformation. Participants are encouraged to reference relevant equations related to force, distance, and work to deepen their understanding. Clarification of these concepts is essential for grasping the behavior of non-Hookean materials.
Abobaker Ugool
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So i have been given a practical for a non-hookean material i.e. polymer, we were to add weights progressively and then taking them off one by one. After doing so i plotted the weight attached to the polymer vs the length stretched for both adding and removing the weights on the same graph. The teacher told us the area inbetween the two curves is the energy lost/work done and and approximation of the spring constant are the tangents at which the graph curves, such that there are six tangents in total. But i don't understand why the area inbetween the two curves is the energy lost/work done and why the tangents at which the graph curve are approximations of the spring constant??
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Abobaker, welcome to PF :smile: !

Interesting experiment. Difficult to answer your questions without knowing where you are in your education. That's why the template is so useful. It appears to have been lost in your post, an unfortunate accident, I hope. Because in PF its use is mandatory (see the guidelines for reasons why) They also require an effort on your part to come to a solution. That also helps us to provide more useful assistance.

Homework Equations

[/B] -- what equations do you have available relating force, distance, work ? And what do you have about ideal springs (Hooke ?, spring constant, force, distance, work ? )

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]-- tell us what you know already about the work a weight does on a spring while loading.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top