Why is the Coefficient of cosθ Negative in the Exact Pendulum Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saptarshi Sarkar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Saptarshi Sarkar
Messages
98
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Show that the solution of the exact pendulum equation
can be written in the given form
Relevant Equations
##\ddot \theta = -\frac{g}{l}sin\theta##
##t = \int d\theta \frac {1}{\sqrt{A-\omega^2 cos\theta}}##
The question is

1583505635525.png


My attempt is given below

_.jpg


I am not sure what to do now. I don't understand how I can make the coefficient of ##cos\theta## negative.
 

Attachments

  • 1583505614004.png
    1583505614004.png
    14.9 KB · Views: 197
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Saptarshi,

I suspect you don't have to. Your derivation seems correct to me and agrees with what we see here

Moreover, usually ##\ \theta \le \theta_0\, , \ ## so ##\ \cos\theta \ge \cos\theta_0\ ## and the square root is real.

I think the book expression is wrong and yours is right.
 
  • Informative
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
BvU said:
Hello Saptarshi,

I suspect you don't have to. Your derivation seems correct to me and agrees with what we see here

Moreover, usually ##\ \theta \le \theta_0\, , \ ## so ##\ \cos\theta \ge \cos\theta_0\ ## and the square root is real.

I think the book expression is wrong and yours is right.
In addition to this, I think the OP should have chosen the negative square root, rather than the positive. theta is decreasing with time.
 
  • Informative
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
Chestermiller said:
theta is decreasing with time
Only half the time.
 
  • Like
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar and Chestermiller
Thanks. I guess I should have added "initially." However, the minus sign prevails at all the times.
 
  • Like
Likes Saptarshi Sarkar
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top