Why Is the Complex Conjugate Taken Again in Orthonormality Proof?

  • Thread starter Thread starter raintrek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Proof
raintrek
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a proof of the orthormality condition for a complete set of states and am struggling with one element of it:

Consider the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian in the following way:

1: \int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV = E_{n}\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV

and

2: \int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV = E_{m}\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV

Taking the complex conjugate of the second (for H real) to obtain

3: \int\Psi_{n}H\Psi^{*}_{m}dV = E_{m}\int\Psi_{n}H\Psi^{*}_{m}dV

Now subtract them:

1-3: \int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV - \int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV = (E_{n} - E_{m}) \int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV

I don't understand why the LHS of eq. 3 in this subtraction has had it's complex conjugate taken again, yet the right hand side has remained as it is in 3. Is it something to do with the Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian? Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Orthonormality can be established as follows. Start with

H\Psi_{m} = E_{m}\Psi_{m} and

H\Psi_{n} = E_{n}\Psi_{n}.

Multiply top by \Psi^{*}_{n} and integrate, likewise with \Psi^{*}_{m} for the second. Complex conjugate the resulting 2nd equation and use the Hermiticity of H

\int\Psi^{*}_{m}H\Psi_{n}dV =\int\Psi^{*}_{n}H\Psi_{m}dV

to rewrite the left hand side. Subtracting the two equations now gives

0=(E_{m}-E^{*}_{n})\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{n}dV.

Now either

\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{n}dV=0, m\neq n

because the eigenvalues of distinct states are different, establishing orthogonality, or

E_{m}=E^{*}_{m}

establishing that the eigenvalues are real.

Normality simply comes from normalizing the eigenfunctions so that

\int\Psi^{*}_{m}\Psi_{m}dV=1.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top