Why Is the Constant Excluded in Uncertainty Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elitewarr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
AI Thread Summary
In uncertainty calculations, when multiplying by a constant, the relative error remains unchanged, meaning the uncertainty does not increase. For example, when calculating the diameter of a tube, the uncertainty in the diameter can be halved when divided by two, resulting in a new uncertainty of +/- 1 mm. The formula for uncertainty, tR / R = tA / A + tB / B, excludes constants because they do not affect relative uncertainty; they cancel out in the equation. Absolute uncertainties can add up, but relative uncertainties do not change when constants are involved. Understanding these principles clarifies how to handle uncertainties in physical measurements.
elitewarr
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
For a question like In an experiment, the external diameter D and internal diameter d of a metal tube were found to be (64 +/- 2) mm and (47 +/- 1) mm respectively. What is the maximum percentage error for the cross-sectional area of the metal tube?

I will need to find the external area.
So, area = pi(1/2d)^2
But I'm confused over whether should the uncertainty change?
What I mean was 1/2(64 +/- 2) = (32 +/- 1) ??
Or will the uncertainty remain at 2? If it remains at 2, the percentage uncertainty will definitely change.

And why does the formula R=kAB, k is a constant and A and B are physical terms, has the uncertainty formula tR / R = tA / A + tB / B
where tR / R, tA / A, tB / B are fractional uncertainty.
Why is the constant excluded?
R = kAB = AB + AB + AB ... + AB
So won't the uncertainty add up?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


elitewarr said:
But I'm confused over whether should the uncertainty change?
What I mean was 1/2(64 +/- 2) = (32 +/- 1)
Yes. X = 64 +/- 2 means we are sure that X is between 62 and 66, which is equivalent to saying X/2 is between 31 and 33, hence X = 32 +/- 1. Multiplication by a constant always preserves relative error.

And why does the formula R=kAB, k is a constant and A and B are physical terms, has the uncertainty formula tR / R = tA / A + tB / B
where tR / R, tA / A, tB / B are fractional uncertainty.
Why is the constant excluded?
R = kAB = AB + AB + AB ... + AB
So won't the uncertainty add up?
The absolute uncertainty adds up. The relative uncertainty is unchanged since
\frac{\Delta R}{R} = \frac{k \Delta(AB)}{k AB} = \frac{\Delta(AB)}{AB}
 


Ok. Thanks for clearing up things.

"Multiplication by a constant always preserves relative error"

This is also due to the constant being canceled right?
 


elitewarr said:
Ok. Thanks for clearing up things.

"Multiplication by a constant always preserves relative error"

This is also due to the constant being canceled right?

Yes, that's right.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top