Why is the decay of Ds*+(2110) → Ds+(1969)π0 forbidden?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunrah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Meson
sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Why is D*+(2010) → D+(1869)π0 allowed via the strong interaction but Ds*+(2110) → Ds+(1969)π0 forbidden.

The numbers in the brackets are masses in MeV.


Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


My guess was that mass was not conserved, but if π0 is 135 MeV then it is. Strangeness is also conserved. Charge is also conserved. Isospin is also conserved. What else is there to consider?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok so I see that for the allowed process we have:

<br /> |c\bar{d}\rangle \longrightarrow |c\bar{d}\rangle|d\bar{d}\rangle<br />
for example and for the forbidden process we have:

<br /> \\<br /> |c\bar{s}\rangle \longrightarrow |c\bar{s}\rangle|d\bar{d}\rangle<br />

my question is does the first process conserve quarks? if so how? I think that the strong interaction can create a quark-antiquark pair from either an up or down quark. But the antidown on the left could create a π+ particle but where does the other down quark come from to make the D+ meson? thanks
 
Last edited:
here is a stab at answering my own question.
in the first allowed process, the D*+ particle decays producing a d\bar{d}

pair via a gluon and then the \bar{d} joins with the charm quark forming D*+ and the d-quark with

the \bar{d}-quark from the left hand side forming the pion. is that right?

but i still don't know why the second process is not allowed. i think it is allowed under the weak force but why and why not under the strong

thanks
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top