Why is the limit of ln(x)/arctan(x) as x approaches 0 from the right, not zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Numnum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Zero
Numnum
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is the limit of ln(x)/arctan(x) as x approaches 0 from the right, not zero?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I used L'hopital's rule and got zero. But question specifically states that is not the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} \ln(x) = -\infty$$
whereas
$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} \arctan(x) = 0$$
so L'Hopital's rule does not apply.
 
As jbunniii said, L'Hopital's rule does not apply here. Notice that If x= .000001, we have
\frac{ln(.000001)}{arctan(.000001)}= \frac{-13.8155}{.000001}= -13815510
not anywhere near 0!
 
Thank you!

But, that's all there is to it? I don't have to simplify anything? Just plug in values?
 
No, I didn't say that. In order to prove that a limit is a specific number you have to prove that it gets arbitrarily close to that number. My point was that for x very close to 0, the function value is very far away from 0. It is theoretically possible that a function would turn from being around -13 million at x= .000001 to 0 at x= 0, but that would be a very strange function!
 
It's so obviously unbounded that it's rather a strange question. Are you sure you've stated it correctly?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top