Why is the Lorenz gauge chosen for causality in EM potentials?

bakshi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Choosing the Lorenz gauge implies that sources of the EM potentials at a given point are the charge density (for scalar potential) and current density (for vector potential) that cross a collecting sphere converging at the speed of light toward that point. It is often said that the retarded potentials thus obtained satisfy causality.

My question is the following: Why is the collecting sphere converging at exactly the speed of light? Couldn't it converge at a lower speed?

What is the justification for assuming that an information that is not light must travel at the speed of light? Does some equation require it, is it empirical knowledge or is it just a postulate?


Thank you for your help,

Bakshi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the answer to my own question. You can choose any gauge you want for the potentials: no matter what the speed of the collecting sphere (which is even infinite for the scalar potential in the Coulomb gauge), they will all lead to the same equations for the fields, and these equations are causal at speed c. Therefore if potentials are not considered real in classical physics it should not be mentioned that the Lorenz gauge has to be chosen for causality reasons.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top