I Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancies between simulated and experimental total cross-section data in neutron-proton scattering. The simulation uses the Phase function method to calculate phase shifts and relates them to cross-sections through established equations. Significant differences arise in certain energy ranges due to the contributions of various states, particularly the dominance of the triplet and singlet states below 1 MeV and their reduced influence between 100 to 350 MeV. The findings suggest that other states contribute more significantly to the cross-section in these energy ranges. This analysis highlights the complexity of neutron-proton interactions and the need for careful consideration of all contributing states in simulations.
jhonconnor
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
I made a simulation of neutron-proton scattering phase shift to find the total cross-section, but the sim and exp data have a large difference of magnitude between them.
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is
$$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$
##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first find both scattering phase shift in degrees, putting ##y_{i+1} = 180/\pi## to make tables and graphs. Later, for ##\ell = 0## state the equation that relates phase shift with partial cross-section is
$$ \sigma_p = \frac{4\pi}{k^2}(\sin \delta_p)^2$$
At least, total cross-section is expressed as
$$ \sigma_{total} = \frac{3}{4}\sigma_t + \frac{1}{4}\sigma_s$$
where ##\sigma_t## and ##\sigma_s## is triplet and singlet cross-section respectively. But for some energy range is there such a large difference between sim and exp cross-section. I verify using "exp phase shift" and putting them into the equations, but the order of magnitude are the same that I obtain with my simulation. What is the reason for that? Note: ##k## have units of ##1/\mathrm{fm}## and in the table data is in Barn units.

Just try it with ##E_{lab}=##300 MeV ##\delta_t = 6.60## and ##\delta_s = –4.46## in degrees (with ##E_{cm} = m_pE_{lab}/(m_p+m_n)##)
 

Attachments

  • 1757103971017.webp
    1757103971017.webp
    62.9 KB · Views: 12
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I found that it's due the contribution of other states. In other words, for energies below 1 MeV, ##^3\mathrm{S}_1## and ##^1\mathrm{S}_0## states have more contribution rather than ##\ell = 1,2,3,...## And, between 100 to 350 MeV, triplet and singlet states have less contribution than others.
For more information, see Table 2 in:
Khachi, A., Kumar, L., Awasthi, A., & Sastri, O. S. K. S. (2023). Inverse potentials for all ℓ channels of neutron-proton scattering using reference potential approach. Physica Scripta, 98(9), 095301.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes ohwilleke, Astronuc and PeroK
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K