Why is this length included when finding moment about an axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the calculation of moments about an axis in a 3D system, specifically regarding a crank shaft and the forces acting on it. The original poster is confused about the distances used in the book's solution for finding moments, particularly how the book sums distances without considering their respective axes. Clarifications reveal that the moments are summed about joint A, and the distances must account for the correct axes, with the z-axis passing through A, meaning A does not contribute to the moment about that axis. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately identifying the dimensions and forces involved in the calculations. Ultimately, the poster plans to seek further clarification from a professor to resolve their confusion.
wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have to find reaction at the joints but that's not important. I'm having trouble understanding what the book is doing but first allow me to explain the diagram so there is no confusion because 3D pictures are kinda hard to draw. In the first diagram there is a crank shaft running along the y axis. 0.1 m after point B it goes down 0.2 m along the z axis and then 0.1 m along the y axis.A is a thrust bearing and B is a smooth journal bearing

Homework Equations



Statical equilibrium equations apply here

The Attempt at a Solution


When finding the moment about the z axis the equation should look something like this according to me.
Bx(0.5+0.6)- ux x rCA x F = 0
rCA=-0.1i - 1.3j + 0.2k
and ux = i
but here is how the book does it.
Bx(0.5+0.6) - F(0.2+0.1+0.6+0.5) = 0
Now I understand to find the moment about an axis I have to take the force and multiply it by the perpendicular distance between the force and a point on the axis. This works if both the axis and the force lie on one plane. When dealing with multiple planes I have to take the cross product. But I really have no idea why the book is doing what its doing. Can someone tell me if my equation is right or not and also explain why the book simply takes all the distances involved in getting from C to A and adds them without any regard of which axis they follow. Ask for clarification if I did a bad job of explaining.
 

Attachments

  • 20121130_195946.jpg
    20121130_195946.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 457
Physics news on Phys.org
Your dimensioning seems off, and I don't know what happened to the 75 kg load, but in any case you can solve by noting that in general , summing all moments about an axis
Mx = Fy(z) + Fz(y), My = Fz(x) + Fx(z), and Mz = Fx(y) + Fy(x). x, y , and z are perpendicular distances. Looks like for solving Bx, solution used last equation with x = 0. No need to fool with cross product.
 
yes like I said 3d images are hard to draw. don't worry about the load its not important to my question because it doesn't have an x or y component to cause rotation about the z axis. I know how to find the moment about an axis I'm just having trouble with the distances. There are two forces that produce a moment about z axis. The force F and the reaction force at B. I understand how the distance for the reaction force was calculated. but not for F. using the equation you gave me
Mz = Fx(y) + Fy(x) (I'm assuming this is how you meant it)
Since the force F acts only in the x direction Fy is 0 as a result Fy(x) is 0. this leaves me with Fx = F and y = 0.2
so Mz = 0.2F
this is still different than
F(0.2+0.1+0.6+0.5)
 
It is not a good idea to denote an applied force as F, since F is more of a general term to designate a Force; you should use a different letter like P for example to designate the applied force. But anyway, apparently moments are being summed about joint A to solve for Bx, so the y distance for the applied force F (or P if you will) is the distance along the y-axis from P to A, which is difficult to determine from your sketch (looks to me like 0.6 + 0.5 + 0.1 + 0.1, the way you have described it, not drawn it). y is certainly not 0.2, that is a z dimension yielding a moment about the y axis.
 
Last edited:
Yes the 0.2 is on the z axis my bad I'm kinda frustrated with this. and you got the numbers just right. The moments are being summed about the z axis. The reason A isn't included is because the Z axis passes through it so A can't produce any moment about z. It seems my drawing is more confusing than I thought. I'll wait till monday and ask a professor instead. thanks for trying to help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top