- #1
peter46464
- 37
- 0
On the surface of a unit sphere two cars are on the equator moving north with velocity [itex]v[/itex]. Their initial separation on the equator is [itex]d[/itex]. I've used the equation of geodesic deviation [tex]\frac{D^{2}\xi^{\mu}}{D\lambda^{2}}+R_{\phantom{\mu}\beta\alpha\gamma}^{\mu}\xi^{\alpha}\frac{dx^{\beta}}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^{\gamma}}{d\lambda}=0.[/tex]to find their separation [itex]s=\xi^{\phi}[/itex] after time [itex]t[/itex]. I used [itex]\lambda=t[/itex] to give [tex]\frac{d{}^{2}\xi^{\mu}}{dt{}^{2}}+R_{\phantom{\mu}\beta\alpha\gamma}^{\mu}\xi^{\alpha}\frac{dx^{\beta}}{dt}\frac{dx^{\gamma}}{dt}=0,[/tex]expanded out the Riemann components for a unit sphere to eventually get [tex]\xi^{\phi}=d\cos\left(vt\right),[/tex]which is correct. So far, so good. However, my problem is that in order to do the calculation I assumed the absolute second derivative [tex]\frac{D^{2}\xi^{\mu}}{D\lambda^{2}}[/tex] can be replaced the the ordinary second derivative [tex]\frac{d{}^{2}\xi^{\mu}}{dt{}^{2}}.[/tex] This assumption works, but I don't understand why/how I can get away with it. In other words, why don't I need to calculate the absolute derivative using [tex]\frac{DV^{\alpha}}{D\lambda}=\frac{dV^{\alpha}}{d\lambda}+ V^{\gamma}\Gamma_{\gamma\beta}^{\alpha}\frac{dx^{\beta}}{d\lambda}.[/tex]
Can anyone explain why the ordinary second derivative works in this calculation? Thanks.
Can anyone explain why the ordinary second derivative works in this calculation? Thanks.