Why people need to define determinant ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
matness
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
why people need to define "determinant"?

why people need to define "determinant"? Of course there are many reasons
but what i want to know is the first one. -i.e- the origin of determinant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matness said:
why people need to define "determinant"? Of course there are many reasons
but what i want to know is the first one. -i.e- the origin of determinant

There are oh so many applications of the determinant. I will list a few:
* Finding inverse of a matrix
* Finding area/volume
* Cross product
* Eigenvalues / eigenvectors
and so on...

You might find some of these topics related, but my point is; there's loads of things you can do using determinants!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top