Why rocket altitude does not increase proportionally?

1 reply · 1K views · last reply
Starnair
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
1. Why rocket altitude does not increase proportionally with the amount of rubber band stretch? Provide an explanation for the lack of direct correlation.
I'm not sure that I am doing in right way, and cannot understand why k value is decreasing as rubber band stretches because I thought k value never changes.
Relevant Equations
Es=Eg
Photo includes this.
I thought it is because of the consevation of the energy, so I used (gravitational potential energy at the top = elastic potential energy). Since the mass of the rocket never changes, I supposed mass= 1kg, and k value is unknown. As a result, I got the result that k value is decreasing as ruvber band stretches.
 
Attachments
  • Handwritten notes listing rubber band stretch lengths 0.1 m to 0.5 m against rocket altitudes, with calculations of spring constant k from (1/2)k(x)^2 = mgh, giving k values such as 10192 N/m, 2245.4 N/m, 4935.5 N/m, 6868 N/m.
    15600881792087086667835959235450.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 297
I don't think your attachment would be legible even if you had NOT posted it sideways. You should fix both of those issues and re-post it.