Why speed of the railroad hopper is the same? []

  • Thread starter Thread starter amiras
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a railroad hopper car losing mass as sand leaks out while maintaining an initial speed of 15 m/s. Despite calculations suggesting the speed should increase to 17.7 m/s due to the loss of mass, the book asserts the speed remains 15 m/s. Participants clarify that the sand retains its horizontal momentum until it hits the ground, meaning it does not affect the car's speed while falling. The conversation also touches on the complexities of momentum conservation in systems with changing mass, noting that the force equation for such systems can be misleading. Ultimately, the consensus is that the speed of the railroad car does not change as long as no external forces act on it.
amiras
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
There is this problem and I do not understand how could this be:

A railroad hopper car filled with sand is rolling with an initial speed of 15.0 m/s on straight,
horizontal tracks. You can ignore frictional forces on the railroad car. The total mass of the car
plus sand is 85,000 kg. The hopper door on the underside of the car is not fully closed, so sand
leaks out the bottom of the car and falls to the ground. After 20 minutes, 13,000 kg of sand has leaked out. What is the speed of the railroad car now?

The answer is 15 m/s. How could change in mass could not affect speed?

initial momentum of the system where sand is about to start leaking:
p_i = mv

and final momentum:
p_f = (m - 13000)v'

and solving gives v' = 17.7 m/s, but book gives answer of 15 m/s, what am I missing here?

Since most of the sand is on the ground now and do not have speed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the car lost momentum. Perhaps you could explain why do believe the speed would change.
 
What about this force F=dp/dt = v*dm/dt + mdv/dt

dm/dt is not 0 here, since the mass is changing, that would mean that a force acts on the railroad hopper?

And the and which fall from the railroad hopper reached the ground sooner or later and it has no momentum, so how car could loose momentum?
 
I think the problem assumes that there is zero force acting on the car. Rather, there is only an initial velocity: like if you pushed a toy car and let go.
 
The answer definitely is NOT 15 m/s (assuming no external forces are acting on it). Perhaps it's a typo, but you are correct that the velocity will increase.
 
Okay, so what is final and initial momentum of the whole system?
 
elfmotat said:
The answer definitely is NOT 15 m/s (assuming no external forces are acting on it). Perhaps it's a typo, but you are correct that the velocity will increase.

Could you explain why exactly the velocity would increase?

amiras said:
Okay, so what is final and initial momentum of the whole system?

I believe the equations you posted in your original post are correct.
 
That is the case, If I'm posted them correctly then the answer is 17.7 m/s and that means that the speed has increased, but the book gives answer 15 which means that speed does not change.
 
Assume the sand falls onto a frictionless surface and continues to move at the same speed as the railroad hopper. Depending on where the sand exits the railroad hopper, there will be some displacement of the railroad hopper and sand, but once the sand stops pouring out the railroad car, both should have the same speed as they did at the beginning.
 
  • #10
amiras said:
Since most of the sand is on the ground now and do not have speed?

The sand didn't transfer it's horizontal momentum to the car, but to the ground

amiras said:
Okay, so what is final and initial momentum of the whole system?

The "whole system" would include the entire Earth if you want to consider conservation of momentum in this case. Or you simply assume that what happens between sand and ground has no significant effect on the car.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
rcgldr said:
Depending on where the sand exits the railroad hopper, there will be some displacement of the railroad hopper and sand, but once the sand stops pouring out the railroad car, both should have the same speed as they did at the beginning.
If the sand exits at the back, with a horizontal velocity component relative to the car, the car will accelerate of course.
 
  • #12
rcgldr said:
Assume the sand falls onto a frictionless surface and continues to move at the same speed as the railroad hopper. Depending on where the sand exits the railroad hopper, there will be some displacement of the railroad hopper and sand, but once the sand stops pouring out the railroad car, both should have the same speed as they did at the beginning.

This assumption that the sand does not stop after falling makes it right, thanks everyone.
 
  • #13
amiras said:
There is this problem and I do not understand how could this be:

A railroad hopper car filled with sand is rolling with an initial speed of 15.0 m/s on straight,
horizontal tracks. You can ignore frictional forces on the railroad car. The total mass of the car
plus sand is 85,000 kg. The hopper door on the underside of the car is not fully closed, so sand
leaks out the bottom of the car and falls to the ground. After 20 minutes, 13,000 kg of sand has leaked out. What is the speed of the railroad car now?

The answer is 15 m/s. How could change in mass could not affect speed?

initial momentum of the system where sand is about to start leaking:
p_i = mv

and final momentum:
p_f = (m - 13000)v'

and solving gives v' = 17.7 m/s, but book gives answer of 15 m/s, what am I missing here?

Since most of the sand is on the ground now and do not have speed?

You have the answer now, but the key is WHEN did the sand lose its forward momentum - and the answer is "when it hit the ground", not "as it left the rail car"
 
  • #14
The equation F = dp/dt is *false* in non-relativistic mechanics with time-varying mass, but this is perhaps less well understood than it should be. Even as late as the 1990s, clarifications were being published and older errors uncovered. Google "variable mass dynamics", and download (free) the expository paper by Plastino and Muzzio.

RGV
 
Last edited:
Back
Top